|
|
| I am a "conspiracy researcher" and a seeker after truth. Please don't confuse my work with that of "conspiracy theorist." What's the difference? I don't theorize. I investigate, explore and compile and evidence. I lay aside emotional rhetoric and conjecture in an attempt to discover what constitutes "evidence based in fact(s)." I think that many of the facts I have uncovered are of such great import that I am compelled to share them. Do I believe all the conspiracy theories that are floating through the Internet are valid? No! Do I believe some of them are of substance? Yes! I tend to believe those that are based on scholarly research and scientific empiricism.
My research did not begin after the attacks on September 11th, 2007, but rather, 30 years ago. Even further back than that, I was greatly troubled in regard to the secrecy in which the American Government (politically, militarily and administratively) was conducting "business." I have watched as the corporate structure has merged with governmental agencies, mainly through privatization, and how war was becoming a corporate venture, rather than a method of defense. Determined to understand this growing phenomenon, I began to study more intently, developing an American historical perspective - for myself - never intending to share what I discovered, but just to have the knowledge. This website is a culmnation of what I have discovered and continue to discover. |
| I, myself, do not accept the official 911 Commission Report. The reason(s) I don't accept it will become more and more evident as you progress through the various pages of this site and visit the many links, provided to benefit you in your own personal journey of discovery. I would like to point out that my reasons for finding the "Report" unacceptable, are not based in the reported findings of the Commission, but rather, in what the Commission did NOT report. There were many hours of testimony, some of which was given by experts in their field, that were omitted from the final report. There were some testimonies that were briefly mentioned, but determined, for one reason of another, to be irrelevant. There were many that were willing to testify, but their testimonies were never heard by the Commission. I have read the Official Commission Report and it is easy to discern a bias flowing throughout its pages. The only testimony that was considered relevant or acceptable, was that which substantiated the belief that the attacks were carried out by 19 Muslim terrorists with boxcutters (with an emphasis on "terrorism.") Evidence exists, strongly suggesting the use of controlled demolition in the bringing down of Towers 1, 2 and 7, and no evididence was even considered regarding Tower 7, which wasn’t hit by a plane. The 911 Comission Report, in my opinion, multiplied the number of unanswered questions. |  |
| My reasoning is not based solely on the events of 911 - but rather, events that led up to the horrendous lose of life that occured on that day. There is well documented evidence that leads me to believe that this was not an isolated, short-range plot, carried out by a few hate-filled Musilms, and the truth of the matter cannot be arrived at, if we only consider the events of that day. To the contrary, the truth lies in a long, determined effort to establish world dominance. It began long before Islam existed, which came into being in early 600 A.D. It began in what we call ancient times and has persisted and continued to develop over many centuries. One might say that the attacks of 911 were a result of centuries of planning. Let's explore this together, as history continues to unfold. |
| Throughout history there has been an active "controlling interest" phenomenon. At any given time in Earth's history, someone, or some group or people, have been active and instrumental in attempting to control world events and/or control the, then known, World. Charlemaign, Alexander the Great, Kaiser Wilhelm, Hitler and many others took their turn in attempting to achieve world dominance. While attempts by these men were unsuccessful, today there is a growing realization that such an attempt at World dominance is, again, being made, and many fear that, this time, it will come to fruition and ingulf the entire globe in a One World Government.
The attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and the plane that supposedly "went down" in Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11th, 2001 were examples of what a small number of individuals can accomplish, secretly working together with precision and purpose. One of the basic reasons for the 911 attacks was to urther escalate the growing fear of “terrorism.” The resulting fear is to accelerate the attempt to secure global control through acts of terror. This statement is true, whether you accept the Official 911 Commission Report that concludes that nineteen men of Arab descent (Muslims) highjacked 4 planes and successfully flew 3 of them into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, or if you think that high-ranking members inside our government were complicit in the attacks. Both of these scenerios are conspiritorial in nature. The Government's conspiracy theory (911 Commission Report) casts suspicion on Muslim terrorists and the alternative casts suspicion on the Government. Consequently, the Government, itself, is cast as being terroristic. Regardless, whether the Arab highjacker theory or the government's complicity (or a combination of the two) are true, a conspiracy was involved. The question is NOT which conspiracy theory to believe. The question is: After considering all that evidence that is available, which conspiracy does the bulk of evidence support? Whichever is found to be true, the result is that it is no longer a conspiracy theory, and the one that is found to be false (a lie) is, more than likely the one that should be suspected of having had a part in the events of 911. This is not about belief - it is about factual evidence vs. hidden agenda. In the final analysis, the true story will be based in fact, and, if there is a hidden agenda, the theory connected to it will be exposed. Solid, diligent research will both reveal truth and expose error. |
| If the 911 Commission Report is accepted, then the motive for the attacks would seem very simple - "They attacked us because they hate us." George W. Bush, in his “Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People,” nine days after the 911 attacks, stated, "They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other." Compared to my understanding of the Islamic system of belief, President Bush's remarks, revealed to me that he knows little about what their motive(s) might have been. It also revealed that there is an agenda that is furthered by having Americans believe such rhetoric. President Bush's agenda is that which, through mass media propaganda and disinformation proliferation, has guided and manipulated public opinion to accept President Bush's "continued" rhetoric. The truth of the matter is, among other things, at the same time G. W. Bush has been instituting Executive Orders and signing statements (see below) that are, in fact taking away the rights and freedoms that he is accusing the muslims of hating. |  |
In the light of his latest Executive Order, it would seem that our right to disagree is dimishing. Concerning G. W. Bush's regard for the constitution that guarantees those freedoms, here is an excerpt from a conversation that was comfirmed by no less than three individuals."I don’t give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way."Here is a  to a Google Search, so you can check out some sources of this incident and articles regarding its ramifications. As you continue to explore, you will find out why this declaration was so easy for him to make. This is not the first time that he has placed his judgment in opposition to the constitution. He has also dissolved the protection we once enjoyed in the Bill of Rights. The Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act have both limited those cherished rights to the point that, in essence, they no longer exist. He knows very well, and so do his cohorts, that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights will both be rendered obsolete, when the North American Union becomes a reality. This is one of the reasons he can, so easily, dismiss the validity of the Constitution - because he knows it is about to become a "thing" of the past. It will, indeed, be nothing more than “a Goddamned piece of paper.” [Bush Quote ~ Sorry about the expletive.]
|
| The Muslim belief is based in their love for Allah, not the hatred of those who have freedoms they don't possess. A Muslim's view of freedom of religion is based on the fact that their's is the only true religion. It is not so much that they "hate" others that believe differently. Their belief is more truely reflected in the fact that true Muslims strive for "Pure Islam." Pure Islam is based in the fact that you are either a Muslim (follower of Mohammed) or you are an "infidel." There can be no Pure Islam as long as there is an infidel alive on the face of the Earth. This may seem a harsh position to take, but if you have ever studied the Q'uran (Koran), you will know that this thinking is prevalent, throughout its pages. While it is true that many Muslims would like to just live their lives in peace, a large number of them resist such "complacency," because it robs them of the opportunity to ever experience Pure Islam.
Perhaps, to better explain this perspective: An analysis carried out by an official at the Department for Work and Pensions, and revealed in a related document, said: "The key to engaging this group (Muslims) in a positive way is, obviously, by reducing discrimination and promoting integration." Officials also judged that some Muslims had difficulty in reconciling their "Islamic identity" to living in a multicultural society and regarded mainstream Muslim organisations as "sell-outs."Personally, I am not against the Arabic people, nor the Islamic/Muslim religion. However, at the same time, I am very much aware of their determination to dominate the world by "out-populating" other races and regions. Shortly after the attack of the London subway system a man of Arab descent stated, “We do not need to do such things as bomb you or commit acts of atrocity to you. We intend to take over by means of population, growing larger and larger in size, until we are the majority and thereby, become the ruling class.” This statement supports two realities, 1) They are not intent on bombing anyone into submission and 2) They DO intend to take over the world and create an environment conducive to "Pure Islam." It has become quite evident that President Bush, while in office, wass either ignorant of the true nature of the Islamic movement, or that he was purposely misinforming the American people. (You can View a video, listen to an audio or read the transcript of the State of the Union Speech on the White House website, if you like.) You will see that he overlooks the true nature of Pure Islam ideals and attempts to, instead, lift up the fact that Muslims are peace-loving, harmless citizens in a foreign country ruled by despots, when in fact, their religion (the basis of their government) is itself despotic. It must be recognized, however, that there are numerous sects, some of which apply their beliefs much more stringently. "...are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah." (Applause.) "The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them." (Applause.)Further on in this same speech, he played upon the "Freedom vs. Fear" theme by stating, "Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom — the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time — now depends on us. Our nation — this generation — will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail." (Applause.)After recognizing the complicity that brought about the 911 tragedy and those who played a part in it, I find these words to be quite empty, especially in light of all the destruction that continues to unfold in Iraq (and soon, Iran). I understand that by presenting the situation in these terms, he is able to maintain the personal tragedy factor (in that their god is being blasphemed) and, at the same time, demonize the "invisible" enemy among them. This provides two reasons to forward his agenda and maintain our presence in Iraq, 1) for the protection of the victims [a job that is not being performed too well] and 2) to root out the evil "terrorist" entities. Soldiers often state that it nearly impossible to tell the difference between the two, and therefore, obscures both the ability to protect the victims and the ability to route out the terror against which we are at war. If you do NOT accept the 911 Commission Report, and many do not, then a broad spectrum of possibilities emerge. I have found many to be valid, but others seem invalid, because, proving their "case," involves too much speculation and conjecture. There are many, who become extremely emotional regarding the issues they explore and that, in itself, obscures their findings. The most compelling and provable theories are those that are based in scientific, empirical evidence and those are the ones upon which I focus the majority of my research. By virtue of sharing various sites from which I have gatheredd information, some will seem contradictory. If one has a strong desire to seek out the truth of a matter, that desire is usually accompanied by the capacity to recognize truth, when it is discovered and error, when it is exposed. The attacks of 911 were carried out by those who operate on the "create a problem/assess the reaction/provide a solution" form of terrorism. Though many have been blamed for these atrocious acts of death and destruction, no one has "accepted" the blame, admitted guilt, or been proven guilty. This essay is not intended to "prove" who the guilty are, that will have to be done through further investigation, but whoever they are, the whole world (with the exception of those responsible) hold them in contempt and desires that they be brought to justice. It is not my intend to prove anything, but rather, to make articles, videos and various types of documentation available, so that seekers can determine, for themselves, what is true. If I didn't, however, declare my own deductive findings, then I will not have taken a stand, and would be as guilty as those who surrender to complacency or hide in denial. One of the major factors involved in the enability to ascertain just "who" the culprits are, is that all of the evidence that might lead to a just conclusion, are not being considered or appraised. It seems to me that only those, who would NOT have the truth known, would be averse to a full examination of the facts, and they are also the ones who warrant suspicion. In reality, much of the evidence that would prove who the responsible party is (or parties are) has been destroyed and many of the facts regarding the incidents of that day have been obscured. Perhaps, a place to start would be to investigate those responsible for the destruction of the evidence. There is also much that could be discerned by giving consideration to who is attempting to obscure the facts, such as: who is not willing to release all the documentation, tapes and videos, and actual testimony of "on the scene" eye witnesses to these dastardly deeds. My personal interest and the beginning of my research regarding the events of September 11th, 2001, began just a few days after that fateful day. Even as I watched the news broadcasts that day, I realized immediately that something was askew, but I saw no real reason to doubt the "main stream" reporting, nor did I have viable justification for placing blame on any particular person of group. I thought it strange that those in high governmental positions immediately began engaging in the "blame game" and, through experience, I have come to know that those, who play this game, are quite often engaging themselves in "blame shifting", rather than "knowing" who is actually at fault. This, of course, is my own particular perspective, developed over years of observing human interaction from the sidelines and, therefore, what I seemed to be witnessing had to be left open for further consideration. However, I am an inquisitve sort and decided to engage in a little personal investigation, through which I might attain a reasonable conclusion. Boy! was I ever surprised! If you would like to see some of the things I discovered, visit my Freedom Links page." What I discovered (and continue to discover) was that the events of 911 began a ripple effect in the minds of many Americans. It began in the minds of those who were already distrustful of "The Establishment" and is now blossoming and blooming in the minds of some who would never have suspected that their government would, or could, be complicit in such atrocities. Many feel that their patriotism has been misplaced, although they often fail to realize that the government that was (is) responsible for the atrocities of that day, is NOT the government to which they owe their patriotic loyalties. The government that was complicit in the acts of that day is a shadow government, acting apart from, and in addition to, the government they rightfully know and love. "The Government," as we once knew it, has been plundered and overrun by another that in no way resembles the government that STILL deserves our loyalties. Please remember, the government that was established in the middle and later part of the 1700s, based on the constitution, was "...of the people, by the people and for the people..." and we are still the people. However, there are, in reality, two governments. One "seems" to be in control and attempt to follow the Constution, while the other is behind the scenes, controlling all things pertaining to the finance, military complex and foreign affairs of the United States of America with little or no regard for the Constitution or the people it is intended to protect. Point of clarification: In the paragraph above, I stated that there are "two governments", which is true in regard to the point I was making, but I believe that there are actually four different levels of government:
I consider myself to be a sceptical optimist. I don't appreciate a "jump to a conclusion" approach in anyone, especially myself. I am, and have always been a student of life, not just observing, but studying. I have developed my persective on life by studying every different perspective I can find, whether or not it agrees with my "current" perspective. I am open minded, but not to the degree that I can be influenced and "change my mind" just by considering someone else's perspective. I need facts - documented facts - heresay is often irrelevant and misleading, but that doesn't always make it unreliable. To me, heresay is a call for investigation and verification. Most would probably think or say that I am not qualified to speak on many of the topics I address, the one thing that DOES qualify me is the fact that I am and American with (for the moment) freedom of speech. Before I began my process of discovery, I had only my own ideas and perspective upon which to rely. Now, I have the research and findings of a multitude of experts, each of which have added valuable width and depth to my perspective, making it more objective and reliable, at least, it has become more reliable to me. The title of this essay, "911 ~ An Act of Exposure," has two meanings. One is that on September 11th, 2001, particular events unfolded that initiated a process that has led to the exposure of those who were/are actually responsible. The other is the fact that, at that time, I began a journey of discovery that exposed the fact that I was almost totally unaware of the immense governmental intrigue that was playing out all around me. I was well aware that wickedness existed in other forms and in other realms and I knew that corruption abounded in governmental circles, but I was unaware of the extent of the corruption or that it was global in nature. I have been a student of the Bible for 30 years and very aware of the sinful nature of mankind, but in the last 6 1/2 years I have become increasingly aware of how accurately prophecy overlays world events as they continue to unfold. I have been given a far greater understanding of Ephesians 6:12, which states, "...we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Even before 911, I had been aware of the fact that the rights and freedoms of the normal American citzen were dwindling. I once stated in an email to G. Edward Griffin of Freedom Force International (of which I am a registered member) that "I seem to have the same rights and freedoms that I have always had, I just need to be careful not to exercise them." He agreed. I have watched citizen rights erode and the U.S. Government, established to serve the interests of the people, devolve into a system of plutocracy and oligarcy and quickly moving toward totalitarianism, fascism and tyranny or desptotism. As an American citizen, it troubles me greatly to know these things and even moreso to speak of them, but anyone who researches our current state of affairs will recognize that corporations now control the government and the government increasingly controls the people. Rather than being "...of the people, by the people, for the people..." our nation has become "of the government, for the corporations, over the people." Virtually every governmental agency is being (has been) privatized (corporatized) and the normal work-a-day American is under bondage to the edicts of these controlling interests. The word "corporatism" is derived from the Latin word for body, corpus. This original meaning was not connected with the specific notion of a business corporation, but rather a general reference to anything collected as a body. "Collected as a body" is a very relevant term in the discussion of both privitization and incorporation (corporatism). I relates to a larger, more defining word and that is collectivism. This term, when used in regard to the global control that is being foisted upon the world through "collective trade agreements," collecting countries into clusters and then merging the clusters. On the Big Corp page, you can see the overlapping of agreements and countries, intricately manipulated so as to form a one world corporation and initiate a new world order. Of course, this cannot happen if there is no power to impose and enforce the "guidlines" that have been determined, but not to worry, that too, has been corporatized, privatized, and absorbed into the collective. "International" forces, have been and continue to be, mustered and equipped to quell any opposition to their global cause/plot. Even our military is being used against us in our streets. Rather than focusing on protecting us from "foreign invasion." In other words, we are being invaded by those who are (were at one time) assigned to protect us from external threat. The first two mandates for any law-enforcement action is to secure the perimeter and contain the threat. There is no mandate to protect the public and when they enter an area of disturbance or disater they are scripted to say, "We are here to help you. Please Remain Calm. We will not tolerate civil disobedience!" Yes! this is what they are instructed/ordered to state very plainly. There are a number of major problems related to this. 1) They say that they are here to help, but they bring no form of aid (and even restrict help organizations from entering the area). 2) Calm is relative. In the case of the immediate aftermath of the 911 attack on the Twin Towers, people were screaming and running in all directions away from the tumbling towers, and yet, Mayor Gulliani stated that they were calmly exiting the area. 3) Civil disobedience can be anything from demanding food and water in an "unorderly manner" to rising up in armed conflict.
The question is more and more often being asked, "To whom do I turn to, when the only ones to whom I can turn, are against me?" "Totalitarianism is on the rise everywhere because advocates of big government have taken leadership control of the power centers within every society. Power centers are organizations and social groupings – such as political parties, labor unions, church groups, media centers, and professional societies – that hold political power based on their claim to represent their members and on their ability to lead public opinion. It has taken many years for them to achieve this dominance over society, but they have succeeded. It does no good to complain or to theorize about what should be done. As long as advocates of big government hold the power, nothing will change." To explain a little further regarding depotism (see the description below), I say when George W. Bush's statement, "You're either with us (who is us?) or your with the terrorists," I was very alarmed, as were many other Americans. I was surely not for sending our troops to Iraq to fight an unwinnable battle (the pretext for which was based on lies), so in that regard, I was certainly not "with" him. Does that mean I'm with the terrorists? Certainly not! Hearing him label it a "War on Terror" was even more alarming. It revealed to me that he didn't/doesn't understand, in the least, what constitutes terrorism and that declaring war on terrorism is akin to declaring war on evil, which is God's responsibility and He's the only one with the power to do deal with that. But, we must all realize that George W. Bush has an hidden agenda, as did his father, George H. W. Bush and his grandfather, Prescott Bush. (See The Bush Family Fortune).
If a person were to do a little research regarding the Bush family fortune and how it was acquired, they may be surprised, but they would also be enlightened in regard to why I say that George W. Bush has a hidden agenda. He does not enjoy the full backing of the Congress, Senate and House of Representative, but then, he no longer needs their backing, if the entities upon which he relies to carry out his agenda have all been privatized, such as the military (under Cheney and his privatized branch of Haliburton, known as Kellog Brown and Root) or Blackwater, the "guns for hire" mercenary force. Bush calls them coalition forces. Local police are, now, also under (in full cooperation with) the military and subject to the leadership of Armed Forces commanders. President Bush has also just signed another Executive Order declaring that the Military can be called in to "quell civil disobedience" in any state in the union, solely at his discretion and without the approval of the Governor of the State in question. To me, this is scary business that tends toward Despotism. I realize that I have made a lot of blanket statements here, but please realize that each of these statements are based on research that I have done over the past 30 years and intensified greatly since September 11th, 2001. I was driven to gain a knowledge of the world's current state of affairs and I hope that you will determine that it would also be in your best interest to study to see if these things are so. If you choose to not expose yourself to what is transpiring around you, so that you have an opportunity to respond in a reasonable manner, it will expose itself to you at a time when you will no longer have a choice to make, because the choices will already have been made for you. |
  
|
| ~ Definition of Terms ~ |
|